cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/51078361

Here, using high-resolution satellite-retrieved data and interpretable machine learning techniques, this study quantified the impact of NEVs on atmospheric pollution, specifically particulate matter particles with an aerodynamic diameter of 2.5 μm or less (PM2.5), nitrogen dioxide, carbon monoxide and particles with an aerodynamic diameter of 10 μm or less, and evaluates the corresponding health benefits. By 2023, NEVs led to reductions of 23.80% in particles with a diameter of 2.5 μm or less (8.97 µg m−3) and 30.67% in carbon monoxide (0.26 mg m−3), resulting in the prevention of approximately 262,000 non-accidental deaths and 75,000 all-cause deaths, respectively.

  • FiniteBanjo@feddit.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Self reported stats from China have been known to be off by a factor of 10. They’re still the worlds largest consumer of coal and their population density likely leads to statistically worse outcomes.

    • fozid@lem.radiantfig.fyi
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      You could say the same of any countries reporting. I wouldn’t specifically believe a word from the us, EU or UK without actually verifying it. The fact they are reporting it though shows they believe there is some positive impact. They know somebody will check, and if it’s total bs, it will be shown to be. Interesting to read about, but I will take the numbers and impact with a pinch of salt 👍