I feel global political oppression or global wars usually produce great music but Macklemore might be the peak.

Nothing against him, some of his songs are good, but I expected real rage inducing stuff with everything going on. Or is this just the state of music as a whole?

      • socsa@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Fred Durst is and has always been a boot sucking poser. He has never protested anything beyond a groupie telling him “no.”

        • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          19 hours ago

          In all fairness, back in the day it was limp Bizkit that got me into rock and the much better stuff. Not listening to them anymore (maybe every now and then something from their very first album) but still, without LB I would never gotten into rock the way I’m today

        • jsomae@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          21 hours ago

          didn’t realize until just this moment that Rise Against ≠ Rage Against The Machine

    • rabber@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      They are one of the classics lol

      Wes Borland is one of the most underrated guitar players easily

      • Zannsolo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Limp Bizkit isn’t anywhere close to the others on the list, might as well listed Papa Roach.

        • Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.deOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          2 days ago

          I love that people hate on them and try to hold them down. They were a massive band. Look at their collaboration, everyone wanted to be on there. They were pure rage.

          • Zannsolo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            16
            ·
            2 days ago

            Just because they were big for a couple years doesn’t mean they produced anything of value. Angsty music for middle class white boys is nothing special.

            • Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.deOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              2 days ago

              You should really look up woodstock 99 and see the lineup. They headlined the whole show. Doing music with Emenim, Wu-Tang, and Korn, all 90s and 00s icons. Fred Durst help out staind and puddle of mudd. You might not like them but you can’t ignore what theu brought to music.

              • Zannsolo@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                2 days ago

                I was in highschool when they came on the scene. I’m well aware of Woodstock 99. Nothing you said counters my point. Looking back they didn’t belong in the same breath as the other bands you listed except puddle of mudd.

                • Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.deOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 days ago
                  1. 24 mil. With 10 mil highest sold over 4 cds
                  2. 28 mil. With 14 mil highest sold over 4 cds
                  3. 11 mil. With 6 mil highest sold over 4 cds
                  4. 9 mil. With 6 mil highest sold over 5 cds.
                  5. 27 mil. With 14 mil highest sold over 4 cds.
                  6. 29 mil. With 13 mil highest sold over 4 cds.

                  Tell me which one of these bands had the most influence. Also what does race have to do with it?

                  • Zannsolo@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    ·
                    2 days ago

                    Records sold doesn’t = valuable music, culturally. Blink 182 was huge they didn’t make a lasting impact on music.

                    It’s ok if you like limp Bizkit but stop pretending like they made meaningful music. Next you’ll be comparing them to the Beatles.

          • Lunar@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            2 days ago

            nirvana, tupac, and rage against the machine all had something meaningful to be raging about

            limp bizkit was just misogynistic bro music

          • Jesus_666@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            2 days ago

            I wouldn’t say pure rage… They were certainly high energy but not super focused on being angry. This may in part be due to Fred Durst adding major frat boy vibes.

            I have no idea what they’re like these days.