Important progress has been made regarding bringing MLS end-to-end encryption to the ActivityPub protocol, with developers already building implementations and providing feedback to a future version of the protocol spec.

      • ageedizzle@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        2 days ago

        Matrix is not really integrated into the ActivityPub protocol the same way DMs usually are. I would have to open a separate application to message you on Matrix, I can’t just click on your profile and shoot you a DM (or can I?).

          • ageedizzle@piefed.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            2 days ago

            There you go. So I think adding DMs to ActivityPub would add an extra level of convenience

          • Zagorath@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            I mean, there’s nothing technically stopping one app supporting both protocols natively, especially since Lemmy already includes a field for people’s profiles to link their Matrix ID. Though to my knowledge none do it yet.

            • KNova@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 day ago

              Sure, in the same way there is nothing stopping Lemmy from using ATProto. The problem is all competing standards and what the developer chooses to use.

              • Zagorath@aussie.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                10 hours ago

                Perhaps, but I’m describing something slightly different. Your description is basically “one platform supporting two protocols that basically do the same thing”. I’m talking more about “one app that has two separate-but-related bits of functionality, each using the more appropriate protocol for that job”.

        • Steve@communick.news
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          2 days ago

          ActivityPub is only one of a number of federated protocols.
          One notably unsuited to instant messaging.

      • A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        I, too, am often pissed at clickbaity, exaggerated, deliberately ambiguous headlines.

        The subtitle makes it clear though: this is about ActivityPub, which has grown into the #1 federation protocol I guess.

      • Vittelius@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        No it’s not. Matrix isn’t part of the Fediverse. It doesn’t use ActivityPub and there is no interop with any other Fediverse service.

        That doesn’t make Matrix bad, it just makes it it’s own thing.

        • Steve@communick.news
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          ActivityPub isn’t the only way to be federated. Email is federated. Email isn’t ActivityPub. Matrix is no different.

      • Sean Tilley@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        It’s not, the demo video actually shows that being one such use case. There’s nothing stopping anyone from writing a chat service in ActivityPub. But this can also apply to statuses, media, all kinds of other stuff.