Stupid ass private education bullshit

  • Lemminary@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    14 minutes ago

    It only costs money to get the little piece of paper that says you did the thing and are therefore smarter. 🙃

  • hightrix@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    3 hours ago

    It doesn’t.

    It takes time and effort to gain more knowledge. It has never been cheaper or more accessible to acquire knowledge than it is today.

    To increase your intelligence, is another matter all together.

    • Bazoogle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Honestly, there isn’t hardly anything you couldn’t learn on your own. But what higher education provides is structure. It can be very difficult to actually follow through with the education if you do not have scheduled classes, exams you have to study for, deadlines for projects/exams, etc

  • CatDogL0ver@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    Private lessons don’t make you smarter. They just make you more well equipped with.

    I am a lifetime student. I am not smarter. I am not a smarty pant

  • blockheadjt@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Because billionaires have an interest in remaining billionaires, and if everyone was smart, there’d be more people tearing down the structures that consolidate wealth and maintain wealth inequality.

  • rumba@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Gatekeeping education.

    Keep the rich rich and the poor poor.

    The rich got theirs and it’s a ladder they can pull up to stay wealthy.

  • Thoven@lemdro.id
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Essentially, because it takes labor to create educational material. Unless you own slaves labor isn’t free. And in fact with the modern library and Internet access I’d argue self educating is more accessible than ever in history.

  • nomad@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    7 hours ago

    *in the US. In Germany a semester at my university costs about 300 Euros and that includes cheaper lunch and a ticket to use all public transport in the whole of Germany.

  • Nighed@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    I would argue that its rare for education to make you smarter, it mostly makes you more knowlegable.

    Knowledge is mostly free though. You can get it from the internet, from the library etc. A lot of what you are paying for is the certification - some places let you just sit the exam I think.

    • Ansis100@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Or in some cases, like FOSS, the knowledge is freely available, but you pay for a detailed course or tutorial to receive that information in a simpler, more streamlined way.

      • Nighed@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 hours ago

        A lot of the time I paid to have it taught to me so badly that I would have been better off with a textbook. 😢

        They then call me up once every few years to ask for a donation! Fk off, I’m still paying off the loan!

  • Devolution@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    9 hours ago

    For centuries it was called “gatekeeping.” Education is the means of mobility. The elites want that limited.

    • HugeNerd@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I doubt the term was used. Perhaps “guild”?

      Education as a means of mobility is a recent idea, I’d say finding cubic miles of oil allowed that to happen.

      What use could a medieval serf make of calculus?

      • Juice@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Irish and Islamic Arab scholars were widely sought during medieval era because their countries contained the last surviving copies of the entire roman classical canon and before, locked up in monasteries with monks and scribes copying them by hand, in all different languages, since the fall of Rome and the spread of the catholic and islamic religion into those areas.

        In the dark ages, they were the only people with any access to information about the past, they spoke and could read and write many languages. Advanced mathematics were developed in Iraq in the 9th century, or even earlier in the vedas, and made their way to Europe in the 12th century. Fibonacci made a name for himself in Italy through these discoveries, which had a thriving intellectual culture in various regions for the larger part of the feudal era.

        So no I dont think its a recent idea. The ruling class in every era has always needed the educated to interpret the world. The formation of an educated middle class is fairly recent, but as the middle class gets squeezed harder, look how the first thing to go is quality public education.

        A sharp, curious and questioning mind is route to whatever passes for freedom in any age. Whether or not that opportunity is available to everyone is a sure indicator of a whether a society is more free, or more repressive.

        • HugeNerd@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          That’s not what is in question. The question was that everyone needs education for mobility.

          Once the powerful got their special information, do you think serf #2 would get the same treatment?

          “The ruling class in every era has always needed the educated to interpret the world.”

          A naive take at best. They wanted advantage and weaponry. Once they got that from one educated person, what advantage was there for anyone else to know it? If anything, it was to the advantage of the ruling class to make sure no one else knew.

          • Juice@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Ah a rationalist. That’s what I love about rationalism, any relationship to reality is severely rationed

            • HugeNerd@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 hours ago

              Ah, a wiggler. That’s what I love about wigglers, any argument they don’t even understand they can wiggle out of.

              • Juice@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                36 minutes ago

                A wiggler? Did you learn that on the first day at sophistry class at fallacy school? Is that a technical term or are you completely, totally, irredeemably full of your own farts

      • Devolution@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        There would have been a patron behind the serf to even allow him school to begin with. So the serf using calculus is because a Duke felt he had promise.