Porn is everywhere. 80 percent of the web is porn. There’s porn here on Lemmy and on Mastodon. It seems like a whack-a-mole situation .

  • notfromhere@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    It’s not a war on drugs porn, it’s a war on personal freedom, OK? Keep that in mind at all times.

  • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    15 hours ago

    As you’ve accurately identified, they can’t. Best they have is say “nooo you can’t” and hope sites comply out of pure fear. Even if they could, VPN.

    They also completely bungled prohibition, drug prohibition, and the states with restrictive gun laws are bungling that. And women from the anti abortion states can still get out of state abortions.

    Bans don’t actually work, especially when there’s already an abundance and the banned thing in question is easy to produce.

  • missingno@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Conservatives have been labeling anything and everything they don’t like as “porn”. A queer romance novel is “porn”. Two male characters kissing on television is “porn”. Drag queen story time is “porn”. The picture book Heather Has Two Mommies is “porn”. And the thing they’re really most afraid of, educational resources for LGBTQ youth are “porn”.

    So by declaring porn illegal, they now have a pretext to go after everything they call “porn”. Their goal isn’t to remove all porn from the internet, it’s to make it harder for people who need those educational resources to access them. It’s not about porn, it’s about “porn”.

    • HakunaHafada@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      8 hours ago

      It’s not about porn, it’s about “porn” controlling the population.

      FTFY. It’s always about authoritarianism and control of the people.

  • AsoFiafia@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    20 hours ago

    You’re 100% correct, this is totally a whack-a-mole situation. Some websites follow the law, and some don’t. I have no intention of sharing not only my identity, but sensitive data to access these websites. I use a VPN to bypass this on those websites that comply.

    This is getting out of hand. I feel that we have more government in areas it absolutely doesn’t belong, and not enough where it belongs.

    • Ganbat@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      19 hours ago

      I feel that we have more government in areas it absolutely doesn’t belong, and not enough where it belongs.

      smALl GovERnmEnT

      • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Government that wants to spy on you but can’t directly prohibit encryption, so this is the work around. Prohibit porn, people go for VPN. Oohh, now we have to prohibit VPN which we can’t because its a required tool plus it’s really hard to prohibit… so what else can we do, then? Government backdoor keys ftw!

      • AsoFiafia@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Do you care to elaborate? I can’t figure out what exactly it is you’re trying to say here.

        • wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          14 hours ago

          Republicans are traditionally, and on paper, the party of “small government”. “Fuck off feds, it’s none of your business” type shit. Some just wanted a small central government that let states and local government make their own choices, some wanted as small a government as possible at all levels.

          Which is also why you see a minority of old school republican voters refusing to call Trump’s clown show republican.

          That capitalization style is meant to be mocking, because the current dipshits in power clearly don’t have any intentions of “small government”.

      • Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Porn sites don’t really want to comply with the ID laws. They’re doing just enough to not get fined by the Land of the Free. They want you to use a VPN so they can continue to have your business without dealing with the ID bullshit. If your IP is not in a bible state they have no reason to believe that they must comply.

  • yaroto98@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    19 hours ago

    It is impossible. US states make the law, and require the websites to self-block the IP addresses within the state using geo-ip. It’s a flawed solution, but comes with the benefit of being able to sue any semi-large website for not self-blocking and the state receives free fine money. Best part is the state doesn’t actually have to do anything, just pass the law and rake in the publicity.

  • neidu3@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    19 hours ago

    I really hope to see official declare a “war on porn”. Considering how terrorism and drugs won the previous two, I’m sure it’s gonna be a fun watch from the sidelines.

    • burntbacon@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      14 hours ago

      I don’t know if terrorism or drugs have “won.” The government is able to use them to fuck up the lives of people who they don’t like… see venezuela and what they’re trying to do with antifa.

    • Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      Really? Have you all not realized that removed almost all porn a few years ago. Anything that wasn’t from a studio or only fans account was removed. All these sites are owned by the same company. Its easy for them to purge content or restrict access. Even with a VPN, they’ll just find the IP they use and ban those over time

      • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        15 hours ago

        I’m willing to bet that, since that happened right as onlyfans took off, most of the amateurs were already looking to onlyfans as a way to monetize their hobby. Surely “no amateur content” on pornhub likely pushed them more to it but I think it was really inevitable with all that, and the affordability of decent camera equipment I’m sure helped.

        That said, I’m fairly certain that you can still have “amateur” content on PH you just need to verify it as you somehow, and then there’s always xhamster, erome, and m*****less (iykyk, and if not, leave it that way) and a myriad of other sketchy as fuck sites that don’t care the source of their videos.

  • Brkdncr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    20 hours ago
    1. Regulate all traffic sent or received across the state.
    2. Send traffic through a firewall.
    3. decrypt traffic
    4. drop traffic that can’t be decrypted.

    Another easier way:

    1. Regulate ISPs with new state laws.
    2. require they block porn.
    3. Sue ISPs that violate the law.
    • FartsWithAnAccent@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      16 hours ago

      decrypt traffic

      drop traffic that can’t be decrypted.

      This would be an absolute fucking disaster for myriad reasons both technical and practical. Any politician who earnestly suggests it as any sort of solution 100% has no idea what they’re talking about and should not be taken seriously.

      Yes, politicians talk about trying to do something like that, but the reality is that it would destroy security for businesses, institutions, and even the government itself. Encryption and VPNs are crucial to just about any modern business of even moderate size.

      • Brkdncr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Many US companies have businesses inside China, it’s bad but it’s not impossible. I wouldn’t be surprised if a state actually doesn’t.

        • FartsWithAnAccent@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          15 hours ago

          Those also companies use VPNs when they transmit, bring burner devices, and take other countermeasures to try protect their data from theft.

          Additionally, there are plenty of people who are citizens there and still get around their firewall.

          Actually getting rid of encryption or making it ineffective would be a disaster: IP theft, identity theft, and all sorts of other problems would greatly intensify without it.

          • Brkdncr@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            15 hours ago

            I agree, but I was answering OPs question on how it would be done and an example of similar tech already in use at scale.