• lastlybutfirstly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 hour ago

    My guess would be evolution. Those horses that let us ride them were fed well and cared for by humans and then mated with similar horses to make more and more of the same. Those that didn’t let us ride them had to fight for their own food and fight for their own mates and didn’t multiply as much. So we essentially happened upon a couple of horses that enjoyed hauling us around, told them to kiss each other, and we got more. Repeat and rinse for tens of thousands of year.

  • Caveman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I’m pulling this from some random place in my head but horses have a strict hierarchy. There’s a head horse that runs first and people became the head horse. This is in stark contrast to zebras that don’t give a shit and cause chaos.

  • LuigiMaoFrance@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    They are forced into submission through a process of violence and psychological torture their abusers call “breaking”. They have also been selectively bred for docile traits.

    Horses that resist this process and don’t allow their owner to ride them will eventually be written off as being “unsound” and euthanized for whatever excuse they can diagnose them with.

    • Bazoogle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Are you saying those slaves are basically animals? Or that horses are basically people? I’m assuming you’re more so going for the latter, which is still a wild idea. They are domesticated animals, not people.

      With your logic, just think of all the enslaved cats and dogs being forced to live in homes with lots of pets and constantly be fed and loved. Does animal cruelty happen? Of course. But to suggest domesticated horses are being enslaved because people have ridden horses for 5,000 years is truly a wild take.

      • Doomsider@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        33 minutes ago

        Yes, the enslaved animals who are inconsistently fed and ignored. All those dogs forced to live in apartments without any interaction the entire day while their slavers slave away as slaves themselves.

        Just because a few people out there genuinely care and treat their pets correctly does not mean the rest are. This is why PETA exists.

        Obviously you have some extremely thick rose colored glasses on.

      • Jerkface (any/all)@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        6 hours ago
        1. fuck off
        2. the very fucking obvious answer that satisfies both questions is, “they don’t have a fucking choice”
        3. fuck right off
        • Bazoogle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          6 hours ago

          the very fucking obvious answer that satisfies both questions is, “they don’t have a fucking choice”

          You are comparing two things that are categorically different. Horses are not moral agents like people are, so slavery literally cannot apply. No animal has moral choices. We do not arrest an animal for breaking laws, because laws cannot apply to an animal. The issue with riding horses is one of welfare, not consent or freedom.

          • KingGimpicus@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            2 hours ago

            https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK616110/

            You are wrong. All thinking, feeling animals have the capacity for morality. Do not confuse morality with lawfulness. These ideas are not connected in this context.

            Compassion and empathy have long been touted to be the traits that separate man from beast, but lo, compassion exists in the animal kingdom as well.

            Nothing that makes people be people is significantly different than anything else found in the animal kingdom. Segregation of empathy is also a learned trait of those who trend towards lower overall intelligence.

  • enbiousenvy@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    17 hours ago

    I used to watch this video two years ago, and a few other horse history video on that channel https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AMHqp0M0T4Q

    It’s a more approachable video for general audience so it may not be super scientific. But they included the source/papers in the description from proper academics.

    Wild horses were originally not fit for riding. It is found that their bones would not be able to support to be ridden. But at the time, horses also started interacting with human & being domesticated as food & material sources.

    But human do realize the power horses have. Human started developing chariots to be pulled by horses. The chariot technology spread around the north eurasian steppe to south in the south-west asia & egypt. But I cannot definitively say if the chariot techbology in egypt or persia came from north or it’s developed locally. I haven’t exactly find out about the relationship of both region when it comes to chariot technology.

    During few thousand years later horses also slowly evolved physicaly to be able to be ridden. And so in later bronze age, nomadic steppe people emerges such as the Saka/Scythians, Xiongnu, etc.

    My personal searching two years ago was definitely very focused on central asia/eurasian steppe region. So I cannot say much about the same stuff happening in south-west asia despite I know there are a lot going on in that area at the same time. But then after writing this and re-read the question, this doesn’t exactly answer why horses allow human to ride them 🤣🤣 I only say about how human changed horse.

    • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Horse evolution is an overlooked aspect that we ignore often. Think of them like dogs: today, there are several different breeds of varying sizes, some burlier, some sleeker. In the early stages of domestication, this variety wasn’t there, but with time and lots of selective (cross)breeding, we got to where we are today.

      Belgian Drafts tend to be big, and this one was the absolute unit

    • Ach@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      17 hours ago

      It’s a work of fiction, but I highly recommend Last of the Amazons by Stephen Pressfield. He does fantastic, heavily researched historical fictions with an abundance of resources at the end to reaearch the history he bases his plots off of.

      It’s basically about Eurasian tribes who had horses central to their religious mythos and how they dealt with the Greeks. It’s fantastic.

      • enbiousenvy@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Thank you for the recommendation! That does sound familiar. The Scythian is the people the Greeks called to what Persian people call Saka.

  • lath@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    122
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    They usually don’t and have to be “broken in”.

    For those few that do so naturally, it’s more of a proto-symbiotic relationship where the rider helps provide food and safety, so they’re kept around as a pet or dumb kid.
    Also, if a predator wants to bite you, having something on your back to throw at them as a distraction can be pretty damn helpful.

    • anton2492@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      22 hours ago

      That explains why my Red Dead horses always buck me off. To give their carnivorous friends a treat while they gallop away. Sonofabitch Rockstar, you did it again

      • TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        43
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        The default setting in a horse’s mind is to not allow anything on its back. They will bite and kick you if you try. However, there is a clever way to change that setting, as ancient humans had discovered.

        Horses are different from many other animals, such as zebras. Horses are clearly more malleable. That default setting can be changed if you’re skilled and patient enough. With zebras though, the setting to bite and kick is pretty much hard coded.

        Some animals, such as camels and llamas can also be tamed and even ridden, but they will always know their position in the tier list of life i.e. way above all humans. They will tolerate humans up to a certain point, but once their patience runs out, the unfortunate human in their immediate vicinity will feel it in their skin. These animals are a bit like cats, but 10x more dangerous.

  • communism@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    1 day ago

    They get trained. Think about humans for example. There’s lots of stuff we don’t think twice about doing that aren’t necessarily things we would naturally do; they’re taught to us socially and we get used to them as part of life. Horses were domesticated, firstly selectively bred to be friendlier to humans and faster, but secondly they still get trained to form a bond with humans and to do what humans want them to do. They get used to being ridden.