• Lorka@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    8 hours ago

    AI have made pirating legal, as long as you are not pirating for personal enjoyment. Isn’t that the defence the AI companies have used successfully?

    • cassandrafatigue@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Its just tribal politics.

      While authority exists, everything it can touch is tribal politics and bullshit abstraction layers on top of them. Literally everything.

      And terrorism. Tribal politics and terrorism.

  • HertzDentalBar@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    15 hours ago

    May all lawyers involved die in the most horrible way possible. Actually scratch that, May all corporate lawyers regardless of involvement die in the most horrible way possible. ☺️

  • ɯᴉuoʇuɐ@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    24 hours ago

    Apparently it’s legal and acceptable to demand, through a court, enough money to destroy the world economy.

    Seriously, if I were the judge I’d throw out the lawsuit until they come up with a remotely realistic number. As it is, it makes the whole lawsuit look like a joke.

  • Tiger666@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    91
    ·
    1 day ago

    Is this the music industry asking for more than all the money in the world again?

    Yes, I did say again.

  • REDACTED@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    1 day ago

    we have stood with the artist community against piracy

    Correct me if I’m wrong, but Anna’s archive is not giving you song downloads, but rather metadata

    over a massive music data scrape

    So when are you going to sue AI companies?

    • cyberwolfie@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      19 hours ago

      Correct me if I’m wrong, but Anna’s archive is not giving you song downloads, but rather metadata

      Were they not going to release the songs as well? They just started with the metadata?

      ETA: Yes, this is from their blog post about it:

      The data will be released in different stages on our Torrents page:

      [X] Metadata (Dec 2025)
      [ ] Music files (releasing in order of popularity)
      [ ] Additional file metadata (torrent paths and checksums)
      [ ] Album art
      [ ] .zstdpatch files (to reconstruct original files before we added embedded metadata)

      • Naich@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        9 hours ago

        You can’t sue people for something they haven’t done yet. Presumably if and when the actual music files are released the damages will go up proportionally - probably to something like $(volume of the universe / Planck distance^3)

        • cyberwolfie@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          9 hours ago

          I am not sure the shareholders will accept such a meager compensation. Did you include emotional damage in your estimate?

        • cassandrafatigue@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          7 hours ago

          You can’t

          No. Because you’re meat. Not a real person with articles of incorporation and a robust legal department. Wake the fuck up.

    • far_university1990@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 day ago

      Correct me if I’m wrong, but Anna’s archive is not giving you song downloads, but rather metadata

      200gb meta, 300tb music. Just 300tb not released yet. Might be, might not.

      So when are you going to sue AI companies?

      I think some sue suno and settle for money. And GEMA (germany) sue openai for songtext.

  • mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    1 day ago

    Spotify doesn’t even have that much net worth how the hell one can steal more than that anyway? Also this isn’t even stealing just a digital copy sent by spotify servers

    • rbn@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Spotify doesn’t even have that much net worth how the hell one can steal more than that anyway?

      Because it was stolen already. By Anna’s archive. Isn’t that obvious!?

    • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 day ago

      Probably theorizing every potential peer is pulling the whole archive.
      So net worth * 100.000 potential peers = $$$

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    86
    ·
    2 days ago

    $13.000.000.000.000

    Like, are we 12 now? I too would come up with these bazonker numbers at that age.

    Fuck Spotify,fuck the current legal system that got us here