• BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    55 minutes ago

    Europe isn’t a continent, it’s a political entity. A continent is geographic. EurAsia is a continent.

  • Etterra@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 hours ago

    There’s between 3 and 500. Since it’s statistically unlikely that the correct number would be at either extreme, the most likely correct number of continents would be somewhere around 250, with a margin of error of approximately 245.

  • ominous ocelot@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Of course there isn’t. There are 10 billion people on earth. I even disagree with myself on the matter.

    PS: TIL too.

  • tea@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    82
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Europe being on a different continent than Asia always seemed like bullshit. I can forgive the isthmuses, but Eurasia feels like it’s a thing to me.

    • VindictiveJudge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      13 hours ago

      The Romans divided the world into three equal landmasses before they understood how it was actually laid out and it stuck.

      • Tudsamfa@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Definitely not the Romans. It may have stuck because of them, but the Greeks divided the world that way long before Rome left Italy.

    • ViatorOmnium@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      42
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      But then you run into the issue that the very concept of continent was invented to differentiate Europe and Asia (and Africa).

      • tea@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Eh, words change and sometimes terms outlive their etymology or grow beyond it. We “hang up the phone” but no phone these days is actually hung up. 🤷

        • ViatorOmnium@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          20 hours ago

          That’s literally the same thing, we kept the expression even when we know it isn’t accurate any more, because we still have the need to express the original meaning.

          If anything, we should split Asia in more subcontinents.

          • tea@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            17 hours ago

            Yeah, fair enough.

            Still seems like, with the way that continent is typically defined, Eurasia should be the continent with subcontients of Europe, Asia, India, and the Middle East.

    • Jarix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      12 hours ago

      Continental crusts are an observable and measurable thing

      They contain higher concentrations of aluminum whereas you find higher concentrations of magnesium outside of those crusts.

      They are geological features and should be categorized accordingly. Eurasia makes way more sense than Europe being its own special thing… Except Europe, historically, likes to pretend the rest of the world doesn’t exist in their concepts and as such always considers itself special

  • 5715@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    1 day ago

    Stop doing maps. Years of cartography and this is what they want you believe? /s -ish.

    Cartography always has a hidden set of assumptions and goals and because political geography as infrastructure isn’t exactly a consensus topic either, shenanigans like this are pretty much expectable in geography.

  • ohshit604@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    21 hours ago

    I always assumed North America was Canada, America was the USA/Mexico and South America was Brazil/Venezuela.

    • Quilotoa@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      18 hours ago

      If you accept the 7 continent model, there are 23 countries in North America.

      • Quilotoa@lemmy.caOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Do you mean American as in I’m on the continent of America, or American as in I live in the United States? I could only answer yes to one of those.

        • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          As product of American education system, ain’t no one got no time for none of your riddles.

      • ohshit604@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        20 hours ago

        as Canadian as they come.

        Truthfully, I hold that belief simply so I can make Game of Thrones cracks like “Canadians are keeping the white-walkers at bay” or “We the north”. However, as of recently Winter has not come to this side of Canada.

        • teyrnon@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Really? What side are you on then? I’m in the upper midwest US and it’s been super cold and snowy this year. Like a cold year in the 90s, or an average year in the 80s, but nothing we’ve seen in a long time. Except wtith 4 polar inversions because the jet stream is moving south.

  • wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    1 day ago

    Honestly, the biggest two problems I’ve encountered are:

    1. “Oceania” is not a continent. It’s like seven smaller continental plates. Zealandia is more of a continent than Europe is. Similarly, Greenland is also more of a continent than Europe is.
    2. if you’re going to count Europe, you also have to count India, and in reality, we should probably just talk about cratons and plates, not “continents”.
    • Jesus_666@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Okay, new scheme: Every continental shield is a continent. Everything not on one is terra incognita. Continental platforms are just delusional sea floor.

      Certainly that classification won’t lead to any confusion.

  • LemmyKnowsBest@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    23 hours ago

    I was taught in the second grade that there are seven continents and I still have them memorized and I can still see our adorable teacher teaching & chanting them with us rhythmically:

    North America, South America, Europe, Asia, Africa, Australia, Antarctica

    And there are five oceans:

    Pacific, Atlantic, Indian, Arctic, Antarctic.

    She was such a good teacher I’ve had it locked into my head since I was 7 years old that Russia and Japan and China and India are all part of Asia. I make mental note of that because apparently those geographical facts aren’t universally understood. In the sixth grade one of the most intelligent boys in our class told me I was wrong that Russia is in Asia 🤷🏼‍♀️

    • teyrnon@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Clarifying ocean and sea is rather arbitrary. I mean what makes the Indian Ocean different from the pacific ocean, or the north sea, or white sea, different than the atlantic?

      • LemmyKnowsBest@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        16 minutes ago

        An ocean is a different thing than a sea.

        You want to talk about seas? There are a bazillion seas like the Caspian sea, the Red Sea, the Dead Sea, the Mediterranean Sea, the Black Sea, etc

        But I’m not talking about seas. I’m talking about the five oceans. It’s a simple geographical fact that there are five oceans.

        • teyrnon@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          14 minutes ago

          Inland seas sure. But I mentioned a couple of seas that are really part of the ocean. The North Sea, and White sea for instance.

          But also what makes the Indian Ocean different from the pacific ocean? It’s arbitrary.

          • LemmyKnowsBest@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            36 seconds ago

            If you had a good geography teacher and you learned it in school and passed all your geography quizzes, you’ll know that there are five oceans. And that the Indian Ocean and the Pacific Ocean are labeled separately because they are their own things with their own boundaries. Period.

            Bonus points for you since you seem to care about the North Sea and the White Sea so much. Go ahead and label those on the map too.

      • Jarix@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        12 hours ago

        50% of Canadians live below the 49th parallel is very similar in most reapects

    • Quilotoa@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Well, it’s in Asia and Europe. Big country. If Siberia alone was a country, it would still be the biggest country in the world.

          • LemmyKnowsBest@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            15
            ·
            21 hours ago

            Could your home ever possibly be in two different zip codes?

            When you’re standing on the ground, is it possible for you to physically be anywhere else at the same time?

            • Womble@piefed.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 hours ago

              Moscow is in Europe, as is Petersburg, as are something like 80% of the population. So if you want to be like that and say a country has to be entirely in one continent then Russia is in Europe.

            • Zamboni_Driver@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              ·
              18 hours ago

              Seriously? I thought you would at least be able to come up with a funny explanation to support your nonsensical statement.

              So if France conquered all of Africa? Africa wouldn’t be a continent anymore? Would we just continuously move the continental border?

              If the US conquered Australia, Australia would become part of North America?

              How about you slow down and think about this one for a few minutes.

            • Klear@quokk.au
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              19 hours ago

              Yeah, I’ve stood in two different countries at the same time before. Haven’t you?

        • 🌞 Alexander Daychilde 🌞@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          21 hours ago

          A country cannot be in/on two different continents.

          False. French Guyana in South America is considered a part of France. Not a territory or whatever, it’s in the EU as a part of the country. So yes, Brazil borders the EU, for example, and any number of other hilarious facts.

    • wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      19 hours ago

      To actually answer your question: yes and no. If Europe is a continent, then India definitely is. Both are only separated from the rest of Eurasia by a collision boundary, and Europe’s collision boundary isn’t even active anymore, IIRC.

      Realistically, if you’re counting tectonic separation, then the afar triangle is its own continent, as there’s an active divergent triple boundary splitting it off from the rest of Africa. The coast of California is a different continent than the rest of north america, because it’s split by a transform boundary due to the subducting remnants of the farallon plate (now the Juan De fuca and cocos plates). New Zealand has been accepted to be its own continent for quite some time, since there’s a gigantic slab of continental crust underwater to NZ’s Northwest. Even still, the southeastern portion would be counted as separate by this hypothetical “boundaries-only” definition, because the transform boundary which has created the South Island Alps splits the south island. Madagascar is its own continental crust, as is Greenland.

      Really, if you want to understand the geological boundaries and origins among the areas of the world, I’d recommend considering all of the following five types of data:

      1. Cratons (the really old chunks of continental crust that have just been floating and moving around, making up the continental cores, for the last 3.5+ billion years
      2. Active Tectonic Boundaries (really useful for understanding why there are mountains, trenches, volcanoes and earthquakes where we observe them)
      3. what you can see on a map, like rivers, mountains, isthmuses, and continental shelves (the only thing that our current definition of “continent” actually cares about)
      4. anomalous hotspot volcanism (currently hypothesised to be caused by mantle plumes)
      5. historical terranes and plates (such as avalonia and the flat-slab subduction of the farallon plate)

      If you’re really interested in the tectonic boundaries of earth, check out the Concord Consortium’s “Seismic Explorer” online tool. Super fun.

      So, TL;DR: the idea of a continent is bullshit, and purely cultural, just like our definition of a planet (see minute physics’ videos explaining why the moon should be a planet, and the IAU are bad at definitions)

  • evasive_chimpanzee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    That’s why there’s always the argument that the country should not be called “America”. English speaking countries split North and South America as separate continents, so America the country does not get confused with America the continent. In Spanish (might be regional), it’s all one continent, so someone saying that they are from “America” doesnt narrow it down to a country.

    I think it’s fine to just have different conventions in different languages. If you want country names to be 100% unambiguous in all languages, you basically have to change the name of half of the countries out there. E.g., “Deutschland” could refer to all germanic-speaking countries, but everyone recognizes that it just means Germany.

    • Horsecook@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 hours ago

      I’ve encountered the argument for Estadounidense from Mexicans, but it falls apart when you counter that the name of their country is Estados Unidos Mexicanos.

      If you’re really feeling like putting the screws to them, point out that while all of the USA is America, Mexico Valley is a very small part of the territory of their country, and is itself named after the Mexica people that inhabit it. So rather than translate Estados Unidos Mexicanos as the United Mexican States, it would more accurately be the United States of the Mexica Empire.

      Then you can ask them if they’re Mexica, or from one of the conquered territories.

    • 🌞 Alexander Daychilde 🌞@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      21 hours ago

      It’s fine enough even all in one language. There’s the US state of Georgia and the county of Georgia. And outside the occasional funny misunderstanding, it’s usually clear from context.

    • schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      That’s why there’s always the argument that the country should not be called “America”.

      I think, though am not sure, that this comes from the 13 colonies having once been “British America”, which was by default what people meant when they talked about “America” in English, which stuck after independence.

      E.g., “Deutschland” could refer to all germanic-speaking countries, but everyone recognizes that it just means Germany.

      nowadays anyway; before the German Empire was founded, “Deutschland” was usually understood as the entire German-speaking region (what we call “deutschsprachiger Raum” today), and between 1949 and 1990 “Deutschland” could mean the Federal Republic of Germany (usually including West Berlin), or the Federal Republic of Germany plus German Democratic Republic plus Berlin, or Germany in the borders of 1937, or even just East Germany whose constitution initially started “Deutschland ist eine unteilbare demokratische Republik”.

      • zout@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        Isn’t it because Benjamin Franklin (I think) started naming his fellow country men “Americans”, in order to create cohesion?

    • iegod@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Latin Americans really get upset over it, and I think it’s just irrational. They should let it go.