Let’s say a man decides to change his last name for no other reason than he hates his dad’s last name, and that dad refuses to call his son by his new last name. Then, in my opinion, his son should be 100% allowed to call him any mean name or slur he wants—‘dick,’ ‘shithead,’ the R slur, whatever. You shouldn’t get to disrespect people and expect respect back, so if this person gets called a slut and gets mad, I really can’t feel sympathy for him.

  • taygaloocat@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Yeah that is unless you change your name from Dave to “Xavier” or “Aurora” or some shit like that.

  • Grail@multiverse.soulism.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    1 day ago

    Agree on rude names and swear words. Disagree on slurs. Slurs always bounce off the intended target and hit someone vulnerable who doesn’t deserve it.

  • Shady_Shiroe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    2 days ago

    This is less of a shower thought and more of a “I went into the shower pissed off, and come out still pissed off to write about it” kinda post.

    Not saying the point isn’t valid, just that is doesn’t match what shower thoughts is about… but that is just my opinion.

  • FishFace@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 days ago

    If you refuse to respect the spirit of shower thoughts, I really can’t feel sympathy for you.

  • Petter1@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    I think that only escalates the conflict minimising the probability of a resolve dramatically…

    I think what you two need is long honest talk where both parties give their best listening and trying to understand each others feelings and beliefs.

    The best method to achieve this is different for any relationship, for some it together at a dire with some beers, for some it is hiking etc. Basically a place where both feel secure and have their privacy together.

    • Senal@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      i’m of the opinion that if someone has done their best* [1] to consider the consequences of an approach and chooses to take that approach while accepting the potential outcomes, then that is an acceptable decision making process.

      In some cases escalation might be a potential outcome and as long as the person understands that, then them choosing that option is their considered choice.

      In the same way that freedom of speech* [2] isn’t freedom from consequences, freedom of choice isn’t freedom from other peoples choosing to act against you.

      If you want to make what seems like a poor choice from my point of view, i might advise against it, but ultimately it’s up to you.

      However, i’m also free to try and stop you if that’s what i choose. In this case i’m not looking to curtail your choices, but i am pitting my choice against yours.


      1. a good faith best effort, considering the circumstances ↩︎

      2. the general idea not the US specific thing ↩︎

  • Texas_Hangover@lemmy.radio
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    18
    ·
    2 days ago

    I spent 50 years knowing cats are called cats.

    If you tell me one day, cats are suddenly called billybongs or whatever now… Fuck you. Its a cat.

    • inb4_FoundTheVegan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      That’s not a very good analogy A singular person can name themselves whatever they want, not single handedly change the name of humanity.

    • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      "I tied an onion to my belt, as was the fashion at the time. "

      Language isn’t static. Once most people use a word differently, that word changes. Get over it or get used to being incorrect.

      I’m gonna go pet my billybong now.

      • Adulated_Aspersion@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        12 hours ago

        My billybong is an orange asshole with one brain cell that he shares with all of the other orange billybongs.

        I love my orange billbong, fiercely.

  • scholar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    2 days ago

    Changing your name in order to disassociate yourself from someone (especially to a name from a TV show you have no connection to) is also disrespectful, does your argument work both ways?

    • PixelNomad@sopuli.xyzOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      Changing your name in order to disassociate yourself from someone (especially to a name from a TV show you have no connection to) is also disrespectful

      How is that “disrespectful”? In what way is that “disrespectful”? And if someone is a big fan of Iron man hates his current last name and wants to change it to “Stark” why shouldn’t he.

      • scholar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        How is it not? If you change your name to specifically distance yourself from someone then that is a sign that you don’t respect that person.

        Maybe you really don’t respect someone and want to show it, that’s fine. It’s ok to not respect a person if you find them unworthy of respect.

        There are several valid reasons to change your name, wanting to disassociate yourself from someone is completely valid. For example, Austrian composer Thomas Wanker changed his name to Wander, more for practical reasons.

        • Adulated_Aspersion@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          12 hours ago

          I disagree with your thought path.

          A person changing his name to disconnect from a family name isn’t a direct disrespect to the family name. It is an individual choosing direct respect for himself. Family is dynamic. Blood doesn’t automatically mean family.

          This is similar to the arguments about respecting another person’s religious decision.

          Your religious decisions can sway any decisions that you choose to make about your life. Your religious decisions will not hold away over any decisions that I make about my life.

          • scholar@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 hours ago

            I’m not saying it’s disrespecting the family name, I’m saying it’s disrespecting his father specifically, and that’s fine.

            I think the religious opinion analogy is slightly different, this is someone who:

            1. Has a name that has an association to another person.
            2. They don’t like the other person.
            3. They want to change the name to remove the association.

            That is a valid thing to do, but it is directly disrespectful to the other person because it directly expresses the fact that they don’t like them.

            It is fine to not respect people based on their choices and behaviour. It is fine to express disrespect to people you don’t respect.

      • scholar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        It is still disrespectful, I’m not saying that disrespect isn’t justified. My original comment was pointing out the cycle of disrespect caused by OP’s position.

    • Flagstaff@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      How or to whom is it disrespectful if people say your current name in a mocking way and you just wanna avoid that?

      • scholar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        I’m missing the context of people mocking the name, where was that added? OP only says ‘hates dad’s name’.

        If people are mocking your name they are mocking you, changing your name won’t stop that.

        • Flagstaff@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          13 hours ago

          Not really; remember the then-little girl named “Abcde” by her parents whose case made the news after, I think, a flight attendant or gatekeeper or someone during her family’s travels was reported to have laughed at seeing her name?

          I’m missing the context

          I was no longer talking about OP but just in general giving a perfectly valid reason for a name change. We don’t exactly get to pick into whose families we’re born and parents certainly make suboptimal decisions from time to time (if not far more frequently)…

        • Flagstaff@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          13 hours ago

          Not really; remember the then-little girl named “Abcde” by her parents whose case made the news after, I think, a flight attendant or gatekeeper or someone during her family’s travels was reported to have laughed at seeing her name?

          I’m missing the context

          I was no longer talking about OP but just in general giving a perfectly valid reason for a name change. We don’t exactly get to pick into whose families we’re born and parents certainly make suboptimal decisions from time to time (if not far more frequently)…

          • scholar@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 hours ago

            Oh so you’re completely ignoring the context of OP’s decision and pretending that I’m making a blanket judgement on all name changes, glad we cleared that up.