Meta pushed a WhatsApp update that replaces the soccer ball ⚽ with the FIFA corruption cup soccer ball by Adidas

    • Wispy2891@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Because in my country historically the telecom companies are charging 0.30€ per SMS (text) and 2€ per MMS (text with photo).

      So WhatsApp when they launched with their “1€/lifetime” offer on the iPhone 3GS they were the right app at the right time and became the de facto replacement for any kind of messaging. It’s insane how basically overnight they replaced msn messenger and Skype because it was so convenient (Microsoft never did a smartphone client for msn messenger, only unofficial ones. It was available on dumbphones but it used SMS from the plan to send/receive, nobody used it because you needed to be a millionaire to afford it)

      SMS now in my country is only for receiving OTP codes, for the rest is WhatsApp, because still in 2026 the telecoms are still charging 2€ for each MMS sent and nobody wants to risk huge bills. This includes iMessage because if a chat suddenly goes green and you didn’t notice, it costs dozens of euro

        • Wispy2891@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          42 minutes ago

          The problem is that everyone assumes you have WhatsApp.

          You take clothes to the laundry? The “your order is done” notification is sent via WhatsApp

          Any kind of work stuff is also on WhatsApp

          You order food delivery? WhatsApp

          Amazon started to send delivery notifications via WhatsApp instead of email/sms

          And luckily meta is charging businesses 5 cents for messages via API or otherwise even otp codes would be via whatsapp

          At least here, being reachable only on signal means being a digital exile

    • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I know we’re all saying network effects, but I don’t know what the fuck network effects means.

      Network effects dude. Network effects.

      • calcopiritus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        35 minutes ago

        It’s a simple concept.

        You need at least 2 people to form a conversation.

        One of them has Whatsapp, Telegram, signal, MSTeams, smoke signals and those flags that ships used to communicate.

        The other only has Whatsapp.

        They are going to communicate over Whatsapp.

        Even if the dude with 1000 communication methods meets another dude with 1000 communication methods, they are going to use WhatsApp, because they are used to using Whatsapp with everyone, so it’s just easier to have everyone on WhatsApp.

      • NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        42 minutes ago

        But you get to choose what app you use. And if they continue to support fascism you have to decide if you want those kind of friends.

    • plutopos@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      9 hours ago

      because it’s the de facto sms replacement in many european and south american countries

    • Geth@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      13 hours ago

      I could move to Signal, open up a chat with myself and chat for a while but I think it would get pretty boring pretty soon.

    • scutiger@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      68
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Because most of the world is already on WhatsApp, and changing to Signal would isolate you from most people and businesses.

      • SanguinePar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 hours ago

        changing to Signal would isolate you from most people and businesses.

        Sounds great - if I wasn’t already using Signal, that just might persuade me 😁

      • nickiam2@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 hours ago

        The only people that believe I’m worth contacting have already switched to Signal and the ones that refused to switch lost contact with me. Their loss I guess.

      • Zeoic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Must be more popular in your country, in Canada I don’t know a single person on whatsapp

        • bluesheep@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          14 hours ago

          It’s very big in western Europe. Here in the Netherlands everybody is on WhatsApp pretty much since it’s creation

          • Pechente@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            14 hours ago

            In Germany too and I remember how upsetting it was to me from the beginning. There were third party messengers that supported established (at the time) services like ICQ or live messenger but people got onto the hot new thing because it’s so much like SMS.

            • bluesheep@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              13 hours ago

              I remember starting to use it because texting was pretty expensive and limited at the time. Whatsapp was free (group) texting when on WiFi and still cheaper when on cellular. If texting wasn’t so expensive at the time I really don’t think whatsapp would’ve caught on like it did. Now people are just used to it so that’s probably why it’s still big

              • plutopos@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                9 hours ago

                I lived the switch in second person. My sister kept running out of SMSs to text her boyfriend, and our elder sister told her about Whatsapp and how she could have basically infinite text messages

                • bluesheep@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  8 hours ago

                  Exactly. And, combined with the shared amount of texts/minutes (which IIRC for me was something like 100), actually calling people and wanting to text your friends you’d run out of texts very quick. WhatsApp was a godsend at the time.

        • OliMoli2137@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 hours ago

          Poland , and everybody around me is on WhatsApp, only a few people have Telegram. Searched a bit of saved phone numbers, none had Signal tied to them

        • ForeverComical@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          14 hours ago

          Yeah they’re all on Facebook Messenger which sucks. I’ve managed to switch a few in my surroundings to Signal but I still need to keep Messenger for holdouts.

          • Zeoic@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            13 hours ago

            Thankfully I have managed to get everyone to switch from Messenger to Signal, atleast for talking to me haha. Two other family members being privacy oriented too really helped getting the rest of the family moved over.

    • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      13 hours ago

      I thought people on here of all places would understand the impact of the network effect.

    • CerebralHawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Couldn’t be me… but some people don’t care that Meta can read their messages. Or they still don’t know but I doubt it.

      Mark Zuckerberg has a term for these people…

      • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        That said volleyball to me, but maybe there’s a size difference?

        Anyways the true sport of champions is sepak tekraw. Give me the damn sepak tekraw ball, dude

    • psycotica0@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Wow, I had no idea! I just looked through the list of World Cup balls, and they only used that design, like, twice. But what an impact! I assume they had to get fancy afterwards because every ball started to look like that, so now it looked almost boring. Wild!

    • teft@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      14 hours ago

      That’s cooled it’s named after the Telstar satellite. There’s a high school in Maine that’s also named after the satellite.

    • furry toaster@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      18 hours ago

      whatsapp is unfortunely the lesser evil of propriatery IM when talking about usability, beyond that, the network effect in most kf the world make it the default

      • 🦄🦄🦄@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Huh? What would be the bigger evil?

        And re: network effect, I just told the people I wanted to chat with that I am going to use Signal and then uninstalled. Most followed, some didn’t. That’s just life, I guess.

      • GraniteM@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        17 hours ago

        It allows one to play 45 rpm records, which have a big hole in the middle, on the turntable most people had at home which was designed for 33 ⅓ rpm records, which have a small hole. The shape forms a gentle spring to create tension inside the 45.

        • SanguinePar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Just to add to this, many 45s came with the same small hole as LPs and 12" singles. The big hole was there for 45s that were to be used in jukeboxes, I think.

          • skisnow@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 hour ago

            many 45s

            All 45s. You punched the hole out yourself if you wanted to use it in a jukebox.

          • SanguinePar@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            11 hours ago

            The different playback speed also allows more music to be squeezed onto each side of the disc (albeit at a slightly lower quality).

          • atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            15 hours ago

            Most record players have an adjustable speed and can do 33.3 or 45 rpm and some can do the old 78s. There were also other speeds but they were mostly used for other applications. Otherwise yes, it would sound slow compared to an LP.

              • atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                3 hours ago

                Haha, by other applications I meant I remember there being some background music systems for elevators and retail stores and some early dictation systems and such that were slower, like in the 10 rpm range.

                However… Software used to come on cassette tapes in the days of the C64 and the ZX Spectrum etc. I don’t see why you couldn’t record the same ‘sound’ onto an LP but I imagine the error rate might be far higher. In fact, I would be shocked if it’s never been tried.

      • islandcoda42@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        9 hours ago

        The shape allows the tabs to push in slightly and snap into the 7”. I’ve heard them called ‘spiders’ :)