• ooterness@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 hour ago

    Why would they name it “Visio”? That is already the name of a different Microsoft product.

    • ivn@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      50 minutes ago

      Because that’s the French word for it, a visioconférence.

  • elucubra@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Why didn’t they pour money on Jitsi?

    European, mature, FOSS…

    I fear grift is there somewhere.

    Also, French engineering has a habit of turning sound concepts into messy overengineerd but underbuilt results.

    • e8d79@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      My guess would be that its because La Suite tries to replace all of Microsoft Office and having all the moving parts under your organisations control makes it easier to create a fully integrated office suite that offers the same UX throughout. Also Jitsi is owned by 8x8, a US company, which might have factored into the decision to create something new.

    • FishFace@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Because it’s free, convenient, and works. And it’s a git project so the code is already distributed, so if Trump has another tantrum and decides the EU can’t use any American tech, the deleted PRs and issues would be annoying but we’ll still have the code.

    • stormdelay@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I couldn’t find any particular justification going through their website and other communication, it’s not perfect but it’s probably not that big a deal for an open source project to host their code their? If I remember I’ll try to send them a message asking about it

  • idriss@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    3 hours ago

    That’s one good place I want to see tax payer money going. Would be nice if a more governments join in and make big corpo irrelevant.

  • Auster@thebrainbin.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Was worried they’d use it as a walled garden or a monitoring system. MIT license iirc allows forking, so at least if things go downhill, there are ways to mitigate it.

    • ugo@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      5 hours ago

      MIT is the “do whatever you want” software license, as long as you include the original copyright and license, and don’t hold the authors liable for damages.

    • jaybone@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      4 hours ago

      What’s the license on Firefox and why is it so impossible to create a fork of that browser that doesn’t suck?

      • Vincent@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Mozilla Public License, and there are a number of forks. A browser is a lot of work though.

      • ShimitarA
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Nothing to do with license.

        Firefox is a massive piece of code and following modern browser standards is so difficult that it’s a feat for big teams of developers and no small team seems to be able to pick the pace needed.

  • idriss@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 hours ago

    That’s one good place I want to see tax payer money going. Would be nice if a more governments join in and make big corpo irrelevant.

    • HelloRoot@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      Have you tried selfhosting it? For me, it was unusable, despite a beefy cloud server, even for just 2 people. And thats ignoring setup complexity.

      This one is optimized and kubernetes ready, which makes it super easy. Will try out soon.

      • jim3692@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        I was hosting it 5 years ago in a 2gb or 4gb VPS. We were able to run 1440p@120hz, if not higher, streams of our games. The server didn’t seem to care much about the load.

    • Atropos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      6 hours ago

      I believe this was mostly about stability with 100+ meeting participants. This is second hand information though.