So now we can add “directly capturing a sovereign leader” to the list of crap the US has done. So what do you think will actually be “the straw that broke the camels back” for world leaders to actually do something? Think it’ll be significant or something mundane?

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    4 days ago

    Follow the money.

    See all those billionaire tech cunts propping him up? Sanction them. Ban their software. Block their psy-op social media websites.

  • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    So what do you think will actually be “the straw that broke the camels back” for world leaders to actually do something?

    Frankly? Nothing. Nothing happened after Iraq, nothing happened after Afghanistan, nothing will happen after Venezuela.

  • mycodesucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    155
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    I hate to say it, but there’s no fast answer to that question.

    The best answer seems to be what most smart countries are doing right now… slowly unwinding their dependency on the US and finding alternative suppliers for everything critical they need so they can get the leverage they need to criticize and resist. This has the added benefit of isolating the US economically, reducing its currency’s ability to influence things.

    Over time the US will grow less and less able to throw its weight around, and eventually a tipping point will be reached where picking an ideological fight with the US won’t have a major impact. That’s when the US will be stopped.

    • ramble81@lemmy.zipOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      6 days ago

      Logically that makes sense for an elongated timeline, but that also assumes the US doesn’t ramp up their actions, which sadly seems to be the case. So the question is “what then?”

      • CosmicTurtle0 [he/him]@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        71
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        Nations can’t ignore the fact that the US has one of the most active militaries in the world. Our Navy is more of less second to none and we have nukes. In the hands of a normal president, we might be fine but you sure as heck know that Trump and his Project 2025 people are just itching to launch one.

        This is a situation where there are no good options. The best you can do is continue political pressure, get other nations to rally behind you in the hopes of creating a strong economic resistance.

        But the real answer is that we, the US citizens, need to fucking take this country back. I hate to say it but protests simply aren’t enough anymore.

          • PlaidBaron@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            34
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            6 days ago

            Protests only work if the government feels beholden to its people. It doesnt. Protests arent enough.

          • Soulg@ani.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            5 days ago

            There are protests constantly. There was a protest outside the Whitehouse the same day as the Maduro kidnapping.

          • [object Object]@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            5 days ago

            Thank God the protest people are here. They were constantly on Reddit for the last four years saying how Russians need to protest against the dictatorship. Good thing Russians heard that and had the massive protest of Bolotnaya in 2011 and endless protests in the far-east and northern regions in particular. As we know, Russia is a thriving democracy now thanks to the protests. I was wondering when USians are gonna protest away their own tsar.

        • ngdev@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          5 days ago

          also the worlds largest air force is the US air force. the second largest is the US army’s air force iirc

          • thebestaquaman@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            5 days ago

            I seem to remember reading that the US navy comes in second (which makes sense considering that a single carrier has a larger air wing than most countries air forces) but the point still stands.

          • Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            5 days ago

            Remove the bases in europe and you can only project power with as many you can pile up on an aircraft carrier.

            • Limerance@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 days ago

              B-2 bombers have a huge range of 11,000 km, that’s extended further by tanker aircraft. They can strike any target in the world. They are better with a fighter escort though, that don’t have that range, and only a single pilot, shortening possible mission time.

              The US also has bases around the world outside of Europe. These could be shifted elsewhere, depending on need. The American military is a phenomenal logistics machine. They can fly and ship immense amounts of materiel and can construct huge bases quickly.

              There are several middle eastern and Asian countries that host large American bases. The big bases built in Europe, especially Germany act as a hub for the ones in Africa and the Middle East. A place for supplies, hospitals, training, etc. in a safe and nice place.

              China is still a fair bit away from having that kind of power projection.

    • sobchak@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      I think the wealthy will get US/corporate-friendly far-right governments in place in many of these countries before countries are able to isolate the US without collapsing their own economy. Seems to be the way things are going at least (far-right politics gaining support nearly everywhere).

    • lechekaflan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      The best answer seems to be what most smart countries are doing right now… slowly unwinding their dependency on the US and finding alternative suppliers for everything critical they need so they can get the leverage they need to criticize and resist. This has the added benefit of isolating the US economically, reducing its currency’s ability to influence things.

      What Mainland China is trying to do: win over countries alienated or considered hostile by the Americans.

    • brachiosaurus@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      5 days ago

      I hate to say it, but there’s no fast answer to that question.

      There’s is indeed a fast and peaceful answer: vote third parties.

  • SippyCup@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 days ago

    Do to the US what the US has been doing for 150 years.

    Invest heavily in local anti government revolutionist organizations and support their efforts covertly. You know, like Russia and China have already been doing for 30 years.

  • sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    4 days ago

    Russia invaded Ukraine and was immediately under many sanctions. I don’t get why the world doesn’t treat the US the same way. Aside from greed.

              • aesthelete@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                edit-2
                6 days ago

                That’s part of what Sarah Kendzior has argued for a decade or more. US companies and klepocrats (though I repeat myself) know that the only thing that can match their weight is a powerful federal government. Turning the US into 50 (or more) warring little nations will make it easier to carve up. They have already done this to a large extent with the poorer states under the guise of “state’s rights”. It is also why they run a perennial effort to break up California and it is undoubtedly why the right’s other “big project” is to destabilize the European Union.

          • Limerance@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 days ago

            For whom? Even those making nuclear weapons, have a high chance of dying in the war, have their possessions destroyed, their investments ruined.

        • shalafi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          Not even 1/4th, and that’s counting the stupid, ignorant and disconnected. 77M of 342M voted for him.

          And even among MAGA, money says I could hammer on my fascist neighbor’s door and ask him why the fuck Trump kidnapped the President of Venezuela and he wouldn’t have a clue what I was talking about.

        • Cricket@lemmy.zip@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          6 days ago

          The other half is almost completely oblivious or just doesn’t care what the US does abroad. They only start caring when American soldiers start dying in significant numbers, like in Iraq and Afghanistan. I definitely agree with the other poster who said WW 3 would be a more likely scenario than US revolution because of actions like this.

      • FackCurs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 days ago

        How is the US population to unite, self organize into militias and erect barricades with the current surveillance state and social media polarization?

        Americans are staying at home doom scrolling and getting angry about their scarecrow neighbors they are made to dislike.

        We know for sure that Americans are not ready to do anything more than voting and praying to answer any form of the social question. Haven’t been for a while. We’re on the slope of them not caring about the political question either. It’s all bread, circuses and surveillance algorithms.

        • EldritchFemininity@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 days ago

          Don’t forget about the Sword of Damocles that is the lack of social safety nets. Also, political ignorance is a feature, not a bug in our political system. A quarter of the American population would kill the rest because they think the regime is “hurting the right kind of people” and not anybody that they care about. This also includes the minorities who will soon learn that being “one of the good ones” just means that they go to the showers later rather than sooner.

    • WhatGodIsMadeOf@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      Even that’s just a bandaid fix because it should really be all genuine humans against all other humans that play “the game” of taking advantage of people to get ahead.

      • tym@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        18
        ·
        6 days ago

        People want a turn to drive the hate bus. There’s an idea that the US is the nexus of racism and slavery, but someone had to sell the slaves and I’m guessing if you went to a place like Thailand and started calling everyone Vietnamese (or vice versa), there’d be some problems sooner than later.

    • the_q@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      So the destruction of life on this planet? Yeah you’re right.

      • mrdown@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        you are as bas as the tankies for defending the lesser of the warmongers

  • DupaCycki@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    My best guess is mass riots/civil war. The main reasons why it’s not happening yet are because Trump still has a good number of supporters and because Americans are - rightfully - afraid of their police (or soldiers) killing them.

    Trump is steadily losing his supporters every week, and the number of people at risk of dying due to lack of food or healthcare is increasing. If your life is at serious risk anyway, might as well get a shot at a revolution. And the more people willing to do it with you, the better the chances.

    However, I’m not sure how realistic this scenario is. I’m concerned that a change of government for a slightly better one may be enough for most Americans to calm down. After all, they’re very much used to being abused by their elites, whether they realize it or not.

  • CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    4 days ago

    The EU, China and other major trading partners (many of which are EU afilliates like Japan) could cripple the US overnight by dumping american bonds and finding new trading partners. This is already happening though in a very slow way designed to minimize damage.

  • Jhex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 days ago

    WW3 fought in mainland USA…

    The usa has only ever benefitted from war… once they taste it at home and have cities to rebuild, they may drop the deadly combination of chicken hawk and apathy that seems to be their take on war

  • KelvarCherry@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    USAmericans have shown a complete inability to rise up against their government. This is not surprising given our crushing economic system, the fragility of our lives, and cultural landscape of the USA. At this point I believe Resistance has to come from outside the USA. This is unlikely due to the USA’s extensive nuclear arsenal.

    I foresee the USA going the way of China and Russia, steadily oppressing its people, enriching its oligarchs, and occasionally creating problems for the world. Greenland may very well be the USA’s version of China constantly threatening to seize Taiwan.

  • criscodisco@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 days ago

    The world has to hold us accountable. Sanction us. Make it hurt.

    Americans aren’t the only ones being “cowards” in all of this, as Europeans online love to throw around these days.

  • Hemingways_Shotgun@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    5 days ago

    At this point, every single country should be embargoing the US. It’s well past that point that we cut them off from the world stage entirely economically.