So, lets say we get to August or some summer month, and 4,000,000 people are protesting right out front the white house.

Do they send in the tanks? Do they kill 1,000,000 people? Would republican civilians see empathy for the dead americans who were democrats? Or would it unite the nation like 9/11 did, except this time against the government?

  • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    Would the United States, under normal circumstances, in the era of cellphones and cameras?

    No.

    Would Trump?

    I don’t think theres a single thing that Trump wouldnt do, he is such a infantile, reactionary, egomaniacable manbaby that I can see him doing literally anything, if it makes him feel powerful or if he thinks it’d give him some kind of edge/opportunity.

  • Absurdly Stupid @lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    They don’t bother with such things, America uses other means to squash such protests long before organization.

    The means of organizing (the internet) is also the surveillance state. “grass roots” organizing has been dead for a very long time.

    See the Patriot Act and history of CIA for further details. Recommend “Legacy of Ashes” by former CIA spook regarding history since 1950s or so. The people in charge then have been replaced by far worse, worse every term.

    We only know a tiny bit, and what we do know is truly staggering and frankly when I’ve repeated actual facts online I’ve been told I’m a conspiracy theorist and booted, so I’ll skip that part. The truth sounds ridiculous.

    This is all publicly available information, they don’t even bother hiding it any longer.

  • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Imagine a scenario where an American government deployed armed soldiers into the center of a city to suppress a civilian revolt against the government.

    A thing that has never happened before.

  • stupor_fly@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Without a doubt

    heck we are the blueprint for a lot stuff like this in fact the Nazis studied us for protips on how to do Industrialized racism

    • BeardededSquidward@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      The government has been fascist for a while and has killed its own people demonstrating several times. Too me some time to understand this myself but when I did, I’ve been talking about it for 20 years to people who’ll listen. Needless, not many cared.

  • abbiistabbii@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    64
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Oh my sweet summer child, the United States has had several tiananmen Square style incidents.

    Look up the bonus army, Kent state, battle of Blair mountain…

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Ffs, the response to the LA Riots in '91 happened two years after Tienamen.

      Nevermind the police response to Occupy Wall Street and BLM.

      • abbiistabbii@piefed.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Ruby Ridge was a shootout between a family of paranoid religious whackjobs and the feds after they cocked up handing a guy a warrant, which eventually got taken by what today would be called “Magats” as a rallying cry.

        • Bonus army saw 17,000 vets, 26,000 supporters against the US Army and their tanks.
        • Kent State was a load of unarmed college kids against The Ohio National Guard.
        • Blair Mountain was 10,000 coal minters against The Police, Army, and a Pinkerton Company.

        They call make Ruby Ridge look like a bar squabble.

        • Semester3383@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Yeah, no. The religious nutter part is utterly irrelevant.

          What IS relevant is that the ATF entrapped the dude; they wanted him as an informant, so they spent a long time cajoling and threatening him into cutting a shotgun down for them (“short barrel shotgun”, a National Firearms Act of '34 violation), and when he did, they immediately fucked his life. He ended up getting arresting him, he bonded out, and then got multiple differing dates for a court hearing. He didn’t trust the courts because he thought the gov’t was out to get him (spoiler: they were), and so skipped court. The judge issued a warrant improperly, and then the US Marshalls showed up, and everything went downhill.

          It was a very, very clear case of entrapment, and what the gov’t did was inexcusable. It doesn’t matter that they wanted him to spy on the Aryan Nations, what they did to try and bend him to their will was evil.

          Don’t minimize that shit.

          The gov’t can, and will, crush every single person that they can get away with crushing.

        • HiTekRedNek@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          5 hours ago

          It’s crazy that you believe that government propaganda from then, but rightfully distrust the government now.

          • abbiistabbii@piefed.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            4 hours ago

            lemmy.ml is over there.

            I literally got information from Wikipedia. The wife believed that the end of the world was nigh. Now I will admit, even back then, you didn’t need to believe the end of the world was nigh to not trust the government. But let’s be frank, ruby ridge was not on the same level as the bonus army, or the battle of Blair mountain, or Kent state.

            If you think I shoot out between a conspiratorial family who believed at the end of the world was nigh and group of incompetent cops is equivalent to the battle of Blair mountain, then frankly, I think it’s you that’s fallen for the propaganda.

            • HiTekRedNek@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 hours ago

              I am not saying it’s worse, I’m saying it was still a collosal government fuck up that resulted in the deaths of an entire family.

              Are you trying to tell me that it was ok simply because they believed in a sky daddy???

    • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      True but… None were THAT bad. The US has done some heinous shit but usually it’s outside of their borders. Inside their borsers, still heinous shit but not as bad as Tiananmen square

      Edit: in “recent history” of course, say, within the last 50 years. Go back further than that and you’ll find much greater atrocities, especially against the natives, but do the same in China and it’ll still resign supreme in their atrocities against civilians

  • Sanctus@anarchist.nexus
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    67
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    24 hours ago

    Buddy, we’ve already bombed our own citizens multiple times. Battle of Blair Mountain for starts.

    • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Right?

      So many people are ignorant of history. I had someone in another thread screaming at me how this is all because of 2001. As if this stuff didn’t happen before then.

      • mechoman444@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        23 hours ago

        Short of sending an M1 Abrams, they’ve thrown everything at us along with the kitchen sink.

        We’re way past Tank Man. Also, they already sent in the tanks. The police have riot vehicles which are typically repurposed military tanks.

        I don’t think you understand how bad it is in the US right now.

        There has never been anything like this in this country since WWII and even then the Japanese labor camps were leaps better than alligator alcatraz.

        • I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          13 hours ago

          Dude… Just no. They have not thrown the kitchen sink at us. Tear gas, unconstitutional arrests, even shooting people in isolated incidents is not even fucking close to how bad it could get. Short of sending an M1 Abrams? How about just unloading full auto rifles into a crowd? How about taking out targets with predator drones? FFS, they only just started deploying LRAD.

          Things can, and very well may, get so, so, SO much worse even before tanks start rolling in the streets.

          • mechoman444@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            7 hours ago

            This isn’t Iran.

            If they could have done all that by now they would have.

            It would be fairly difficult to convince any military branch or even police force to open fire on its own protesting citizens. There is a reason why we have three branches of government and Congress and a Senate.

            That’s not to say I’m not downplaying it. It’s still really bad out there.

            Ice is the new age Gestapo.

  • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    22 hours ago

    We did already, when MacArthur razed the Bonus Army. FDR was elected the next election and bought some guillotine insurance in the form of taxes and social programs.

  • Wilco@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 day ago

    MAGA will justify anything as “they shouldn’t have been there”. Even when something happens to them.

  • kugel7c@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 day ago

    Well they certainly could go much much worse. The regime and their base are so far from anything being based in reality I don’t think anyone can truly be certain where this will go.

    And you can just read about early ish days fascism in Germany and see how that meshes with this Regime and it’s historical context. In no particular order :

    • Legislature ineffective and captured/ aligned
    • Judiciary captured /placed
    • Executive controlled (by proxy)
    • Intimidation / Terror Squad
    • Industry leaders largely aligned
    • Populous tired and under economical hardship
    • Extreme militarization
    • Strong and largely aligned surveillance system
    • Scapegoating / internal Enemy phantasms
    • History of ineffective Governance / Corruption
    • Generally unrepresentative and unstable Political System
    • Moderate / Ineffective International push-back
    • Unpredictable and Hostile foreign Policy

    There are also lines that haven’t been crossed yet but there are not a lot before we get to the really Bad ones. So yes Large scale incarceration and killing against internal resistance, or simply against the ‘racialized other’ are maybe already the next steps if MAGA(and the reaction to it) keeps on this trek.

    There could be some kind of thing to fan the flames and lead into the big Bads including probably some external War as well.

    Or there could be circumstances that stop this insanity before we get there. But holy hell Americans are way to chill about all of this currently and MAGA certainly won’t stop until they are made to stumble and fall. Could be self inflicted of course but if the pressure is higher the chance of a fumble goes way up. So every resistance is worth the attempt at this point, and if the ship can still be pulled around there have to be real consequences otherwise it’s just gonna be this again on a few decade cycle. I mean this shit is already worrying over here and in Germany well we seem to rhyme politically with the US of ten or so years ago so …

    For me this certainly is Fascist and we all should know how that goes if it truly gets to go.

  • Steve@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Sure they killed 1,000,000 protestors in the streets of DV, but at least they would never nuke an American city!

    • betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      Suddenly, a flash in the distance turns into an angry, boiling glow. At least getting knocked back to the stone age means not having to see thousands of versions of “I told you so” afterward.

  • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    261
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    In 1970, the National Guard opened fire on a crowd of peaceful, unarmed students, killing four and wounding nine more. A Gallup poll conducted a week after the shooting found that 58% of Americans blamed the students for the massacre, with only 11% blaming the guardsmen. Many students who were present at the massacre were shunned by their own families, some were even disowned, and some were told that even more students should have been killed to teach them a lesson.

    The students, for their part, couldn’t even comprehend what was happening at first. Many of them thought the soldiers’ weapons were loaded with blanks, that they were just trying to intimidate them. After the massacre, many of the students wanted to reassemble and continue peacefully demonstrating, in defiance of the guard. One of the professors convinced them to disperse, by shouting at them that all of them would be killed.

    How was it possible for the public to see it that way? Because of how the media spun it. Even before the massacre, they were saying that the protests were full of “outside agitators” and claiming that they had been doing things like lacing the water supply with LSD. Of course, it eventually “came out” that these claims were complete bullshit based on nothing. So, once the moment had passed, they quietly printed retractions.

    All that shit still happens today. It happens every single time a cop murders someone, whether it’s Renee Good or George Floyd. The right wingers immediately start digging for any possible way to spin it and if they can’t then they simply lie, and if the lie falls apart it doesn’t matter, by that point people will have forgotten and moved on.

    Yes they will kill you. They’ll put people down like dogs and worry about how to justify it later. People want to believe the world is just, and that often means blaming the victim. They’ll do it and they’ll get away with it too.

    Buy a gun.

    • Fedizen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      Lol buying a gun won’t fix anything. You need to train with it and connect with other people who know how to use guns (and who can get other resources for you) or well, Luigi Mangione can tell you the other option.

      Just consuming gun won’t fix anything.

      • BeardededSquidward@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 hours ago

        My question is, why do authoritarians try so hard to disarm a populace then? It seems every person thinks we’ll have a large formation of troops fighting it out and not turn this into any number of guerilla resistance movements against the USA and other countries throughout time.

        • Fedizen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          There’s 1.5 guns per person in the USA, but we also have the largest prison population per capita in the world.

          I can’t name an authoritarian that started by disarming people. My guess would be there comes a point where disarming the populace happens in authoritarian process as part of “disarming the enemy”. When the enemy is the public, you disarm all of them.

          So succesful authoritarians eventually just reach the point where the public is the enemy. They either get there by killing people or imprisoning them or starving them.

          In the US they’re making housing unaffordable. You sell your gun to pay rent, problem solved for the wealthy. There’s much higher death rates for homeless people. There have been a number of stats that say the US has similar death rates to societies in civil wars.

          If guns were used as a solution I think we’d see more sherriffs and deputies being shot during evictions.

        • Fedizen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          9 hours ago

          You can get a gun without buying it. Luigi mangione allegedly bought about half a gun

          • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 hours ago

            Personally, I would rather not walk around with an object that would land me in prison if it were discovered.

            • Fedizen@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              9 hours ago

              Where I live first infraction for a ghost gun is a fine so prison seems a bit dramatic.

              • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                9 hours ago

                Not everyone lives where you live. If I’m giving advice on the internet, where people live in many different locales, I think “buy a gun” is better advice than “3D print a gun.” Especially considering that 3D printed guns require more technical knowledge to put together and there’s potential for misfires or even injuries if you don’t know what you’re doing. Not to mention the cost of the 3D printer in the first place.

                You want to go that route, by all means, knock yourself out. But it feels like you’re picking a pointless fight over this.

                • Fedizen@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  9 hours ago

                  I don’t think playing right into the arms industry’s bosom is good advice unless you’re serious about actually training and organizing around using a gun.

                  Owning a gun doesn’t fix anything, hell using a gun doesn’t fix anything. There’s no guarantee when/if shit gets stupid you’ll even be able to get enough ammo for the thing (let alone the issues with caching a large amount of ammo).

                  The only way guns are going to matter in a realistic sense is if people are afraid to shoot you because they’ll get shot. If there’s actually some kind of civil war you’ll get guns an ammo from the army.

                  I’ve always just gone to the range with my friends who have guns. I’m not going to give the gun industry here a dime they don’t need.

    • Einskjaldi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      That was partially just a result of the NG having rifles but not the less than lethal tear gas and stuff now.

    • SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      32
      ·
      1 day ago

      Everyone calls it the Kent State shootings but all the shootings actually happened on the campus and none in the actual university.

      • GodlessCommie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        1 day ago

        Campus is the grounds and buildings of a university or college. If it’s on the campus it’s in the university.

        • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          12 hours ago

          It’s a sarcastic reference to communists correctly pointing out that the deaths on June 4th, 1989 were in and around Beijing, not on Tian’anmen square itself. It’s a comment intentionally undermining how communists are dispelling Red Scare mythos.

    • unknownuserunknownlocation@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      36
      ·
      2 days ago

      No, what the hell, don’t buy a gun for that reason. That will only escalate the violence. And there’s only so far that you can escalate as a civilian until they roll out the tanks, and your guns can’t do shit against tanks.

      You need power in numbers. That’s how you can build a proper resistance.

      • Einskjaldi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 day ago

        Ukraine has shown that Armour is heavily vulnerable. And tanks are too heavy for the road anyway, it would be wheeled vehicles only.

      • GodlessCommie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 day ago

        That peaceful bullshit only benefits the oligarchy. There’s not a single right you have that wasn’t won via violence.

        • BanMe@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          1 day ago

          Same sex marriage. Transgender rights. We are in a different age, wars are fought by information now. We are fighting the current war for America by information now. Not by bullets. I am all about Luigis rising up but that’s a lot different than “everyone grab semi and hope for the best.” This isn’t 1776.

          • GodlessCommie@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            15
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            23 hours ago

            You think gay rights came without violence? One of the first well documented events leading to where we are right now was called the Stonewall Riots

            • BanMe@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              14 hours ago

              The fight for gay rights STARTED with a riot. Same sex marriage came through the courts, decades later. In a new age. I was there, I was fighting for it. There was no violence when SSM and trans rights were brought about.

              Edit: To further my point, what DID move the needle was public support for SSM and trans rights, which happened through EDUCATION, which is INFORMATION. When public support got there, SCOTUS granted the right, and eventually legislatures followed. A lot of organizations did a lot of work educating the public, which is the very work I did in the third state that got SSM. To act like the Stonewall riot directly lead to SSM is absurd.

          • plyth@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            23 hours ago

            not a single right you have that wasn’t won via violence.

            Same sex marriage. Transgender rights.

            Could make you wonder how much power the elite had to shed for those.

        • unknownuserunknownlocation@kbin.earth
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          16
          ·
          2 days ago

          Except they can’t escalate nearly as quickly if they don’t have an excuse. They’ve been wanting to escalate way further than they have, but everytime they tried to paint protestors/… as violent mobs, reality betrayed them. So far that they’re somewhat pulling back. That didn’t happen because someone shot at ICE, quite the opposite.

          • agent_nycto@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            1 day ago

            They’re pulling back? Let’s see what happens in Springfield because last I checked, they were escalating even before Good died. I’m not convinced at all they are slowing down because people aren’t violent, not at all. I think they aren’t escalating as fast as they want because they’re worried people will turn violent and no jury would convict someone taking down an ice officer.

      • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        You need numbers and you need those numbers to have guns. They are not stopping, they do not care about right or wrong, and there is no telling how far they’re going to go. Without the threat of armed resistance, what is stopping them from open massacres?

        Guns will not keep you safe, granted. But not having a gun obviously won’t keep you safe either. Think about what you’re saying, you’re relying on the fascists to act in good faith, out of the kindness of their hearts. That’s nonsense.

        Nonviolence is a tactic, it can be an effective tactic, but it is only a tactic. If conditions reach a point where that tactic is not applicable or effective, then it will be time to change tactics. What’s the plan if they start firing up the gas chambers?

      • Pat_Riot@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        2 days ago

        You’re a goddamn coward and you deserve to however they treat you. But let’s be honest, you won’t leave the “safety” of your home till they drag you out of it. You’re just going to sit on your ass and criticize those of us who do fight. Broke wristed pacifist, fuck you.

      • BanMe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        1 day ago

        Government has tens of thousands of troops and RPGs and tanks and riot gear and bulletproof shields and chemical warfare and fucking nuclear weapons but Lemmy among others are convinced arming up will save us somehow. It’s proof that the gun lobby has done their job.